• thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Agree, I would put tests higher than documentation, I just got to documentation first and was triggered enough to comment immediately

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hehe, no hate here - I likewise was spinning off of what you said, carrying it forward:-) (bc those are quite important matters indeed!)

        • wols@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bonus: good tests can also serve as technical documentation.

          Though I have to disagree with the notion that documentation is as important or more so than code.
          Documentation is certainly near the top of the list and often undervalued. I’ve worked on a project where documentation was lacking and it was painful to say the least.
          Without documentation, changing or adding features can be a nightmare. Investigating bugs and offering support is also very difficult. But without code, you have nothing. No product, no users, no value.

          There are (inferior) substitutes for documentation: specialized team knowledge, general technical expertise. These alternative pools of knowledge can be leveraged to create and improve documentation incrementally.
          There’s no replacement for the actual functionality of your applications.