• lowleveldata@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    To assess penis size dissatisfaction, respondents were asked to indicate their overall level of dissatisfaction with the size of their penis

    I’m so not answering that I think my dick is small under any circumstances

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This + confounding factors + a garbage can regression + a not so random small sample -> their findings are rubbish.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which is the same issue with many physcology and political survey-based studies. Take a survey that was horribly implemented, run some lightweight analysis (cause what can you really do with 20 respondents anyways), slap a funny name on it, and boom another piece of terrible research.