• Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Will they ever stop creating new services only to shut them down a few years later?

    No wonder people don’t trust them anymore.

    • fourstepper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Even though Apple is a trash company as well, they have one thing going for them, which is if they do something today, I am fairly confident it will be around going into the future, no matter what

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There are zero reasons to trust Google at all, so… I don’t know the “anymore” part…

      Not because they shut down services but because they are Google. Part of the five eyes surveillance network, buddies with nsa and all those guys. Also will sell your private data to get rich, that’s their entire business idea.

      I’ve always found it hilarious that they give people a web page to put their private searches in, and they do it!

      I don’t like Zuckerberg but his opinion about people just randomly uploading anything personal to Facebook and trusting him (he called those people dumb fucks when he was younger)… It is kind of true.

      • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well they give people a web page to put their private searches in and then they perform a search and amongst peers has historically done it the best. That’s not a minor detail, it’s not particularly realistic to use the modern web without a search engine and they’re not secretive about the business model. That doesn’t make it particularly great, especially for privacy, but people are unlikely to pay for web searching.

    • Doesn’t Microsoft do the same (i.e. killing the Windows phones)? It really kills any incentive for me to buy their products. I feel safer actively avoiding them. It used to be you felt safer buying from big names because they were here to stay. Surely enough, companies are but the products aren’t and customers turn into victims.

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah MS did kill their phones but that’s nothing like Google launching dozens of new services then killing them after a few years, Google has unfortunately been doing that for quite a long time.

  • beirdobaggins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dang!

    I have a bunch of domains on Google domains.

    Anyone have some good recommendations of places to transfer them?

    • remram@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      A good thing about Google Domains is that they support SRS for email forwarding, it’s a pain to find providers that do this correctly…

  • princessofcute@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ugh, that’s so annoying. What’s the point of making great products if you’re eventually just going to shut them down?

    • limeaide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe it’s easier for them to sell it instead of maintaining them?

      Google has their hands in too many industries

      • vendion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would imagine it also due to a flaw in how Google works. From my understanding, Google incentivizes adding new features, not supporting things. So, unless you’re on a team that is working on a core product, you won’t get far just maintaining and fixing bugs in a product that is “feature complete”.

  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I was going to opine about how “this is the problem with centralized cloud-based providers, at the drop of a hat they can be acquired and suddenly your content is owned by a company you wanted nothing to do with,” but then again, you chose Google as your domain provider. I think that’s your fault.

    I’d usually say the solution is to self host whenever a cloud provider has a shitshow like this, but in this case that’s not viable unless you want to go all the way up to becoming your own domain registrar or making your own top-level domain. Symptom that maybe the domain name system is broken, maybe we should campaign for it to be opened up for anyone to register their own domain, or least have a reputable co-op or community-owned domain registrar (maybe the open source/fediverse community can pool our funds to set up a nonprofit publicly owned registrar).

    Remember that the fediverse entirely runs on the domain name system as the domain of the instance is used to identify it, and all the security measures relating to inter-instance data sharing is relying on the security of the domains.