EmptiedCoffee@programming.dev to Linux@programming.dev · 1 year agoExploring the internals of Linux v0.01seiya.meexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldlinux@zerobytes.monsterhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkExploring the internals of Linux v0.01seiya.meEmptiedCoffee@programming.dev to Linux@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldlinux@zerobytes.monsterhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareLil' Bobby Tables@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoLittle note… the author talks about 8 GB… but this was eally 90s. Linus didn’t have eight megabytes of RAM. Gigabytes were unheard of.
minus-squareSteveTech@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI think the author was trying to compare how Linus didn’t have 8MB then, but 8GB being common today. But yeah, I still agree that part could be worded better, so I added some suggested words: Linus didn’t have a machine with 8MB RAM [back then] [However] Today, machines with 8GB RAM [1024 times that of 8MB] are very common.
Little note… the author talks about 8 GB… but this was eally 90s. Linus didn’t have eight megabytes of RAM. Gigabytes were unheard of.
I think the author was trying to compare how Linus didn’t have 8MB then, but 8GB being common today.
But yeah, I still agree that part could be worded better, so I added some suggested words: