filister@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoIt looks a lot like VMware just lost a 24,000-VM customer • The Registerwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1458arrow-down14 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansdrs_your_gme@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
arrow-up1454arrow-down1external-linkIt looks a lot like VMware just lost a 24,000-VM customer • The Registerwww.theregister.comfilister@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square75fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansdrs_your_gme@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
minus-squaremonk@lemmy.unboiled.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·6 months agoVMs are for actual isolation. Containers are for overcoming limitations of previous century package managers. They are not the same. =)
VMs are for actual isolation. Containers are for overcoming limitations of previous century package managers. They are not the same. =)