• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nah.

      That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential.

      So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.

      • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m still confused on the difference

        Edit: thank you to everyone who replied, I understand the difference now

        • lakemalcom10@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          Parthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required

          Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          Jurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.

        • homesnatch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          One was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.