• CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Clearly, they do collect metadata and share it with police for the asking. Personally, advertising seems the lesser evil.

    • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It wasn’t metadata it was an entirely optional recovery email address that he used for his apple account.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wrong on both counts. Google on the other hand does everything you’ve accused proton of, and much, much more.

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Evidence? I’ll stipulate Google’s culpability. I never said that Gmail is better than Proton just that there’s not a lot of difference between them, Proton fanbois’ protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          The evidence is in the article above. They don’t cooperate with police requests for information, they only comply with legal orders from the Swiss judicial system. Google on the other hand not only works directly with police, but has been known to initiate contact with police, handing over the contents of entire accounts unprompted.

          Then there’s the fact that the metadata supplied by Proton in this case isn’t even required to use the platform. It’s an optional feature a user can opt into for usability, at the expense of a little anonymity.

          The differences between Proton and other providers like Google are immense. Proton can’t hand over the contents of your account because they don’t even have access to it. Google on the other hand has total access to all your data that they regularly abuse for profit, and will gladly hand over the entirety of to law enforcement. After all, the headline as posted to Lemmy here is misleading. The user wasn’t found out due to Proton, they were found out due to Apple. There’s your difference right there. They couldn’t do anything with the information they got from Proton directly, they had to link it to a different service that unlike Proton, handed over all the users information.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So there’s no real evidence of Google doing what you accuse them of?

            Again, I’m no gigantic fan of Google, but they don’t seem any less reliable than Proton.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              https://policies.google.com/terms/information-requests

              Google can and will share not only metadata, but the full content of all data you have stored on Google servers, including emails, files, and photos. Proton on the other hand can’t share your emails, files or photos with anyone, even if they wanted to.

              https://www.koffellaw.com/blog/google-ai-technology-flags-dad-who-took-photos-o/

              Here’s one of a few cases where Google’s AI will analyze all photos and files you’ve uploaded to Google photos, google drive, or sent/received via Gmail, and can automatically close your account and will report you to authorities. In this particular case, after being alerted by Google, local authorities investigated and found that no crime had occurred. Yet they never restored access to his account. Proton once again doesn’t even have access to the content of the files you upload to their drive offering.

              The differences between these two companies are inarguably vast. Suggesting otherwise is absurd. Yet accounts like yours fight tooth and nail to spread misinformation to discredit privacy-centric service companies. Makes me wonder what your real motives are, because privacy is not one of them.

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Spanish police asked for a court order which was apparently easy to get. So yes, for the asking.

        I never said I have nothing to hide. I said I don’t trust any online service to keep it a secret. And if it’s really important, I sure as hell won’t send it on a postcard (email).