It begs the question, what is the ‘good’ solution.

Or is ‘good’ even possible?

The solution is to have dynamic personalized tutorials.

Lets take Death Stranding 2 for example, since I think its played a lot by working adults.

Death Stranding has a lot of story, relationships, and game mechanics they slowly throw at you. But when you take a break for 1-3 months it can definitely be difficult to remember what you were doing and how to do it.

They already have tutorials in their VR system, but that just goes over the basics. It would be neat if the game took the metrics they collect on you, to teach you how to use your most common moves and such.

It would also be neat if they could have a mentor system where the tutorial would then teach you new mechanics you ignored if it would help you out immediately (totally optional of course).

Good idea on the surface, but complicated in practice.

• where is the labor/money coming from to sell those coffee? I don’t know about you guys buy I rarely see people vote for a raise in taxes for any reason, especially in education.

• teachers do not want parents to be there longer than necessary, parents are the number one reason why teachers leave their career behind. More parent to teacher contact, rather than just restricting to just emails, is a terrible idea

I get his point. Using AI to recompile (or whatever it actually does) does not guarantee, or even care, if the game is actually recompiled in it’s original image.

But the masses don’t care about stuff like that, only die hard fans and devs do. But people who were born 10-20 years later doing their retro gaming phase won’t notice or care about the difference.

It does bring up the question, why should they?