• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 9th, 2025

help-circle




  • If I understand it correctly, it’s the use of negative framing of another person’s physical attributes or demeanor, constructed in the hope the receiver of the “negging” has low enough self-esteem to agree with the assessment and will assume the asshole is a person of higher intrinsic worth.

    There might be more to it, but I usually just think of it as a form of reverse psychology + emotional abuse.







  • For sure: House Republicans move to override Trump vetoes in rare show of defiance

    Not wild about the style of it; like…I can decide what to care about from the facts, I don’t need the site to tell me why something matters.

    House GOP leaders are teeing up a vote Thursday to override the first two vetoes of President Trump’s second term.

    Why it matters: It’s unusual for the Republican-led Congress to openly defy Trump.

    The measures are expected to pass the House with bipartisan support, two sources told Axios. Given Trump’s vetoes, some Republicans could peel off after initially backing the bills. Overriding the vetoes would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate — a rarely met threshold.

    Driving the news: Trump rejected a measure to ease payments for a long-planned water pipeline supporting southeastern Colorado and another that would have expanded the Miccosukee Tribe’s reserved area in the Florida Everglades, the White House announced last week.

    Both bills cleared Capitol Hill in December with bipartisan support. Politico first reported that the House would vote to override the vetoes. Zoom in: The Miccosukee Tribe has been at odds with the White House over its plans to build its “Alligator Alcatraz” immigrant detention center.

    Florida lawmakers in both chambers backed the bill. Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.) said it was about “fairness and conservation.” In his veto notice, Trump accused the tribe of obstructing his immigration policies and said the bill benefitted “special interests.”

    The water pipeline legislation, championed by Colorado lawmakers, would provide drinking water to communities in southeastern Colorado, according to the Bureau of Reclamation.

    But Trump said the bill would “continue the failed policies of the past by forcing Federal taxpayers to bear even more of the massive costs of a local water project.” He added, “Enough is enough.”

    What they’re saying: “This isn’t over,” Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), a Trump ally, posted on X after Trump’s veto. The water pipeline project sits in Boebert’s district.

    A White House spokesperson referred Axios to Trump’s statement on the veto when asked for comment on Boebert’s statement.

    Between the lines: It’s the latest example of Trump’s clashes with MAGA women.

    Boebert defied Trump late last year when she became one of four House Republicans to sign a discharge petition forcing a vote on releasing Epstein-related files — despite White House pressure to withdraw her name.










  • Great summary work — this part makes me a little crazy:

    The Agriculture Department could also turn to a specific interpretation of existing law to justify continuing to fund food stamps, said David A. Super, a law professor at Georgetown University. Under that theory, food stamps are an entitlement program, like Medicare, that is not subject to the annual appropriations process.

    “The simplest approach for the U.S.D.A. would be to recognize that language in the Food and Nutrition Act makes SNAP an entitlement independent of appropriations, and continue paying benefits on the strength of that language,” Mr. Super said.

    Because of course food isn’t already an entitlement program. Always money for weapons, never for starving people.