• graphito@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The description missed: desperate attempt of OP to paint Wikipedia (the open source successful project which democratized public knowledge) same colours as Facebook and Twitter.

    I wonder if there’s some kinda agenda behind it

    • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whenever I see these coy political memes I’m grateful that I’m not on the side where our extremists are the mainstream. The political theory is great, guys. In theory. Don’t make it your personality.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Censorship in the West: we don’t want that on our platform, person goes and finds a different platform.

    Censorship under authoritarian governments: Criticize government? Straight to jail. Uncover wrongdoing by party official? Jail. Political opposition becoming more than controlled opposition? Believe it or not, jail.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Person goes to any platform, and all platforms belong to USA/FVEY. You forgot to point out the second half. Why? Is it intentional dishonesty?

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Overton window

        There’s a difference between socially unacceptable and “straight to jail”.

        You mean like Assange and Manning?

        Manning not only released documents that were under her care as an intelligence officer, but also broke into other systems. Regardless of whether you support what she did, she did so knowing the consequences of breaking her oath. In doing so, she made public wrongdoing, but also exposed sources that the US had promised would be kept safe.

        Assange… well, that feels more like a case of karma. The Obama/Biden administration declined to indict him in relation to the Manning leaks. He then screwed with the 2016 US elections, blatantly stoking conspiracy theories, laundering Russia’s hacks in service of Trump, and coordinating with the Trump campaign to time releases to blunt at least one scandal. In return, the Trump administration indicted him. I don’t fully understand the case, so I won’t comment on it.

        Compare that to investigative journalism in general in the US. Journalists can publish pieces that are extremely critical of both the government and corporations. High up people regularly are dragged down from their perch by an enterprising reporter. Maybe newsrooms aren’t as well staffed as they used to be, but it’s not in the same league as countries like China, Russia, and Venezuela that lack anything resembling a free press.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          There’s a difference between socially unacceptable and “straight to jail”.

          So just a straw man then?

          Compare that to investigative journalism in general in the US. Journalists can publish pieces that are extremely critical of both the government and corporations.

          Journalists can’t question systemic problems in US. Entire books have been written on how journalism in US has been subverted. Read Inventing Reality and Manufacturing consent which both provide numerous case studies.

          The fact that you genuinely believe that quality of journalism in China, Russia, or Venezuela is significantly worse than in the west is illustration of the effectiveness of propaganda in western media.

          Assange did real journalism and he is being tortured for it right now. Instead of being outraged by the war crimes he exposed you choose to smear the man.

          Also, I highly recommend that you read in this book detailing political repression in US. A few excerpts: