A BBC presenter has been accused of paying a teenager for sexually explicit photographs, beginning when they were 17, according to The Sun.
This is legal isn’t it if the victim was 17? What is there to investigate?
As with Philip Scholfield, there is such a disparity in age and power that it becomes very iffy. I’m not sure there’s anything illegal going on but it’s morally problematic.
The problem with “moral” problems is, who sets the morals? The church has been setting them for years, but they are now regarded as outdated and, to be frank, not a shining example of good “morality”.
Someone who’s a beeb star isn’t presenting their radio show tomorrow.
Makes you wonder.
Who?
So there’s an injunction I’m guessing and now it’s the whodunnit.
They say its a “household name”, surely we can work this out
Mike Domestos?
My money’s on Mr Muscle
Barry Scott off of Cillit Bang always gave me wrong 'un vibes.
No, he gets rid of the dirt. He does not add to it. Can’t be my man bazza
tens of thousands of pounds? another meganonce at the bbc
