Dropbox removed ability to opt your files out of AI training::undefined

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Response from dropbox in that post: “Jumping in to clarify some confusion. The AI third-party toggle is only visible to users who have access to our AI features. If you don’t see the AI third-party toggle, then you can’t view or use Dropbox AI features. To reiterate, neither this nor any other setting automatically or passively sends any Dropbox customer data to a third-party AI service. Please see our Help Center article for a list of those with access to Dropbox AI features.”

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know why I find it so surprising that Dropbox apparently has a Hacker News account, but I am mindblown that’s a thing.

      I thought HN would be way too niche for that to be a thing.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you want a laugh, go back to their initial “Show HN” post. It made one person with the top comment rather infamous for being out of touch with his comment on “I could just rsync, why would I use this?”

          • Malle_Yeno@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            For what it’s worth, the reputation of the BrandonM comment on the Dropbox post is pretty overblown compared to what was actually written. The post highlighted some concerns that were legitimate in 2007. And the tone of the comments were supportive of dropbox – the poster acknowledged the feedback and offered use cases that still would lean towards Dropbox, and BrandonM responded that they made sense and wished them luck.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Dropbox is pretty cool. (Don’t mistake this as some weird astroturfing.) I remember hearing about their custom hardware on an episode of se-radio. Very fascinating stuff.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Native Linux client is why I use them. That’s reasonably cool for a corporation in my book.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I did this. Enjoy unsharing literally every shared file and folder and removing access etc. I thought I deleted all my files. Nope. Checked the shared area. You’ll need to undo all of that manually. Only then was I finally able to rid myself of this enshittified disaster. Goodbye forever Dropbox. The only good you ever did was scannable.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I HATE Dropbox.

    I tried to use them recently and their service had some problems.

    They have an option to “stream” files when you need them. The only problem is you need an internet connection to access them. I did not trust this kind of system and I actually need to access my files even without internet.

    So there is a way to make the files available offline. Great! Problem solves. NOPE! They offer an option to have your files available offline, but they might remove the files and make them only available in the cloud if you local storage gets low.

    That is really all they say about it and there is no option to turn this off. I was uncomfortable about their vagueness and my inability to disable this.

    Within 24 hours of paying for their service I learned of this and they refused to refund my purchase.

    PLEASE NEVER WORK WITH DROPBOX

    • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve had a great experience with Dropbox (for about 10 years!), but I also used their Linux client which is old and very straightforward. Now I’m a Nextcloud user, and I wish it worked as well as Dropbox did. But with this AI thing I’m not switching back.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Instructions unclear

      Uploading various types of Nightshade to DropBox.

      EDIT: I see a couple downvotes so I thought I would explain: Nightshade was developed as a way to poison or corrupt AI Generative Tools. Basically by uploading Nightshade I’m harming their results.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      it was painful to migrate from dropbox. their api is shit and does nothing to guarantee delivery. i had to split folders into 5gb chunks and download everything in zip files through the browser. it took a year. what an awful company.

    • andxz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve used Dropbox since literally their first year of creation and I’ve never experienced a single one of these issues. I use it mostly as a portable library and all I need is 2 mins of any internet connection to download any book(s) I want to read to a local device. Mind you this is on their free plan, so I’ve never paid a cent to them either. Requires me to periodically transfer older books to another long term solution, but that is just a few mouse clicks. I’ve read hundreds if not more ebooks this way. Since I prefer .mobi (which I can even read IN dropbox if I want) I can upload straight to dropbox after converting from .epub.

      I mean, it sounds frustrating, but your experience with them sounds extremely weird to me.

      At least to me they’ve been the best cloud provider by far, for what it’s worth.

      With that said, I don’t especially like that they’re doing this even though my specific content is mostly available in any number of places anyway, given that it’s literature.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wait, Dropbox can use your files to train AI? How is this acceptable? Aren’t people storing their keepass vaults there?

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Password manager is one of the few “free” services that I pay for. Still feeling pretty good about 1password.

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Pff, such capitalist bull. But communists at least have LastPass, that shares our passwords with the world under the banner of no private ownership.

        But seriously, paying for a password manager is a good thing. Find a good and secure one that is properly vetted and trusted in the industry, and support them if you can.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I said this in another post:

    If your business is using Dropbox as cloud storage, you are so fucked!

    In 2015, I worked in a company that stored financial records. Small restaurant company with 80 employees. I emailed them last week about this and they’re already making moves to leave.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s wild that you’re still in contact with your former employers.

      Literally every single one has “fired me” and escorted me from the premises after I put in a 2 week notice.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can leave a company on good terms.

        I also highly recommend not burning bridges. Even if they were a shit storm, 2-3 years later you might change your mind.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I have. I didn’t do anything bad to any one of them. I would like to think I was a top performer but they all somehow take it personally that I want more money than they wanna pay.

          If I can get a new job by leaving after 2/3 years and increase my pay by 20%. Why would I stay for a 2% COL raise? Inflation was 18% last year…

          One got upset and said “I don’t know how to process this. I thought you were a lifer…” and then escorted me to security.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The vast majority of employers are critically out of touch with reality.

            It’s like they cannot process what might be of critical importance to employees, and think that a foosball table and pizza parties can somehow pay our bills.

    • Newtra@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      But the comments below say they’re not able to access the new page, even with the direct URL… It seems certain tiers of customers can’t opt out. Possibly they can’t be included in the first place (e.g. EU users), but it’s a pretty big screw up to hide one’s status on such an important privacy setting.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Time for dropbox users to upload all kinds of crap for ai to “learn” from, all within tos of course.

    I bet there are many kinds of ways to make your files poison the ai learning data. Its going to be fun for those ai guys to sort which files are probably safe and which are not. I think even if ONE user manages to slip something that corrupts the training data and its not noticed soon enough it might cause problems for them. Though someone who actually knows something about the subject might want to tell if i’m talking shit or not.

    I’m not against ai in general, but if its trained with data that was obtained from unwilling people, like this, then its makers can fuck off.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It really depends on what the AI training is looking for. You can potentially poison an AI training model, but you’ll likely have to add enough data to be statistically relevant.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        enough data as in many different people will have to upload one or two files that contain such data or you have to upload very large file that contains a lot of data that causes problems?

        • JonEFive@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s honestly difficult for me to say because there are so many different ways to train AI. It really depends more on what the trainers configure to be a data point. Volume of files vs size of a single file aren’t as important as what the AI believes is a data point and how the data points are weighted.

          Just as a simple example, a data point may be considered a row on a spreadsheet without regard for how that data was split up across files. So ten files with 5 rows each might have the same weight as one file with 50 rows. But there’s also a penalty concept in some models, so the trainer can set it so that data that all comes from one file may be penalized. Or the opposite could be true if data coming from the same file is deemed to be more important in some way.

          In terms of how AIs make their decisions, that can also vary. But generally speaking, if 1000 pieces of data are used that are all similar in some way and one of them is somewhat different from the others, it is less likely that that one-off data will be used. It’s much more likely to have an effect If 100 of the 1000 pieces of data have that same information. There’s always the possibility of using that 1/1000 data, it’s just less likely to have a noticeable effect.

          AIs build confidence in responses based on how much a concept is reinforced, so you’d have to know something about the training algorithm to be able to intentionally impact the results.

  • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    If someone has a way to poison their AI training by adding junk along my regular files I’m interested. Sadly I use it at work and I cannot decide to migrate to another cloud so I better sabotage them

      • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you for your contribution, I was referring to a practical way (script, binary, …) to achieve this not academic literature, I don’t have much time to invest in this and my IT level is insufficient

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Any specific tools will require knowledge of the system you’re targeting, so I don’t expect to see many public ML poisoning tools targeting anything but open source ML libraries, but adversarial sample tools to fool classifiers (including repainting stuff like those face transformation filters) might get more common because it’s much much easier to test

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Create a lot of text files filled with offensive and false information. Maybe 4chan and OANN transcripts :)

      It will always be a cat-and-mouse game. Once the trainers recognize the attack, they can use the attack to further improve their models. A long time ago I watched a speech from a guy who worked on Yahoo! Mail’s spam detection. They realized spammers would create email accounts, send spam to them, then have the accounts mark their spam as “not spam.” They came up with a method to automatically identify these accounts, and used them to further improve their spam detection model (if these accounts marked something as “not spam” it was likely spam).

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem, as I’m sure you know, is that a home server is not fit for purpose for the vast majority of people. Managing that is a fun project for some, but a complete non starter for most.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Synology makes it relatively painless with synology drive. It ain’t cheap but neither is drop box long-term

        • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Synology makes the best home NAS hardware you can get. And they are still actively supporting decades-old units with DSM security updates and aren’t stopping any time soon. They get it. And they get my money time and time again.

          • Patches@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Correction: They make the best home NAS Software that you can get and they support it forever (so far).

            Their hardware is often dated and expensive af. But you can’t get the software without the hardware so…

    • hushable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I used to pay for Dropbox about a decade ago, I replaced it with a raspberry pi running syncthing with an USB drive attached to it

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cost prohibitive for many, but yes, people need to get off someone else’s computer.

      • MadBigote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can easily repurpose old drives for this. I started my server scavenging drives and using my laptop. I upgraded to some WD NAS HDD and I’m about to upgrade to a better Synology NAS.

        There are options for people wanting to start hosting.

  • Wet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Happy I moved to Syncthing a long time ago. My data is replicated on several locations and instances on cheap old raspberries+drives and syncs instantly even on my phone, where I keep Obsidian notes. No size limits, no huge hassle, 10 minutes to get a new instance set up.

    Every now and then I will rsync the encrypted version to an offline drive and store it somewhere else.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What do you use for encryption? I’m open to options for encryption. Any opinions about Veracrypt?

      • Wet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Syncthing has built-in encryption and works pretty well, it’s also really easy to use. I have been using it for some time with several instances and never had a problem, it requires more CPU though, so some old raspies had a hard time working with my big photos folder (800GB) when encrypted. On instances that are not encrypted, the full HDD is encrypted (the option you have when installing Linux).

        Not sure how secure it is, but from the docs: Encryption is XChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-SIV with a key derived from the password and folder ID using scrypt. Considering how polished, huge user base and how much attention to detail Syncthing has, I trust it’s good enough for my needs.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Would your photos folder be handled quicker if you split it into two seperate folders of say, 400 gigs each?

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Check for old shares. I had EVERYTHING deleted, from files, recycled bin…For nearly a decade already. BUT. Today I just found there were old shares of those deleted files. I clicked to delete the shares too. Guess what, the files were back onto the dropbox folder as if they never were deleted a decade ago! So I had to delete them again, and then from the recycle bin. And then deleted the account.