• Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    3d printers don’t kill people. People kill people. Or something.

    Anyway, this proposed law is nuttier than squirrel poo.

  • FlounderBasket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’d need a metal barrel, receiver and other parts to make a gun that can shoot more than once. Does anyone know if background checks are required in NY for purchasing those items as well? I didn’t see it mentioned in the article. If not, then people will just switch to wood or other materials to make their ghost guns and hobbyists are left with an extra tax and inconvenience.

    • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      All of those can be made as well. And plenty of people already do.

      You’re last point hits the nail on the head. What are they going to do, require background checks to shop at Home Depot? There’s endless material options and tons of creative people ready to engineer something new.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it pretty contradictory that you don’t (always) need background checks to buy a gun but you would need them to buy a thing that can make specific parts of them.

      • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I think it was Vice that did a REALLY good video/documentary on “ghost guns” that really highlights this. If memory serves, they printed basically a glock and just needed a few springs and a firing pin (and heavily implied the pin could be improvised).

        I love my 3d printer. But I can definitely seen an argument for background checks on them between ghost guns, drones, and so forth. Because it really is “once you level the bed and find a setting for the right kind of filament, yolo”

        • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s stupid. I could also build a gun out of a Dremel and a trip to the plumbing store. Does that mean we should do background checks on dremels?

          • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even a simple pipe gun would need more than just a Dremel.

            But the issue is ease of use. Learning basic machining skills takes a lot longer than going on the sketchy version of thingiverse

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A recently-submitted bill in the New York State assembly would require anyone who buys a 3D printer to undergo a criminal background check which could take up to 15 days to complete.

    While the goal of bill A8132 seems to be preventing the manufacture of so-called ghost guns — unregistered firearms made at home —  it actually would restrict the sale of pretty much any consumer 3D printer in the state.

    The law says “For purposes of this section, ‘three-dimensional printer’ means a computer or computer-driven machine or device capable of producing a three-dimensional object from a digital model.”

    Imagine walking up to the counter at Micro Center with your new Bambu Lab P1S and being told that you have to fill out a form, show ID and wait for your background check to clear.

    Back in May, Assemblymember Linda B. Rosenthal introduced Bill A7489, which makes it illegal to manufacture ghost guns or to distribute the 3D models for them.

    Those laws are also backed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., who framed them as part of “comprehensive anti-gun legistlation.”


    The original article contains 573 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!