Parts of the sea floor near Australia’s Casey research station are as polluted as the harbour in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, according to a study published in PLOS One in August1.
The contamination is likely to be widespread across Antarctica’s older research stations, says study co-author Jonathan Stark, a marine ecologist at the Australian Antarctic Division in Hobart.
Research stations started to get serious about cleaning up their act in 1991.
Much of the damage had already been done - roughly two-thirds of Antarctic research stations were built before 1991.
There are already more than 100 research stations or national facilities, and most of the buildings are located in ice-free areas, where they jostle with wildlife for a foothold on the most viable land.
“The stations have quite a large footprint for the number of people that are there,” says Shaun Brooks, a conservation scientist at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Hobart who co-authored the study.
Each nation is responsible for its own environmental monitoring around research stations, and practices vary, says Brooks.
The sea floor near Australia’s Casey station in Antarctica has been found to have levels of pollution comparable to those in Rio de Janeiro’s harbour.
Source? There is 6 million people in that city. There is simply no fucking way right?
See, with click bait, you can measure whatever the hell you want and then compare it to something incomparable.
Casey Station has more meat juice pollution than 1 Big Mac.
For all we know, they have more polychlorinated biphenyls than Rio.
Yeah… but cmon do they even have samba?
What we don’t need during cleanup is “A Thing” scenario.
Wtf are you trying to say with this comment?
If they clean up, they could find the Thing and then everyone dies. It’s a classic Ice Station film and what I imagine every person worries about. They literally watch it - https://boingboing.net/2018/02/28/scientists-in-antarctica-watch.html
Why does everything have to be serious all the time? Who the fuck downvotes a Thing reference and Antarctica? The unaware, that’s who.
I’m aware of the film. But it has nothing to do with cleaning up, or pollution? I’m only asking because it seems completely arbitrary to bring up The Thing except for the fact that it’s set in the Arctic.
I don’t ask that everything “be serious all the time”, I generally just prefer it make even a modicum of sense.
I see there isn’t any here.
You can’t see how it’s related? Digging around in the poles for clean up, literally the plot of the film.
I bet you can and you don’t want to change your position. That’s fine.
The plot of the movie, and book, was explorative to see what was giving off magnetic signals. They got out there, located a ship, then found the aliens frozen in ice, then dug them up to research. Not to clean anything up.
I laughed. Yes, very literal.
While they are digging for clean up, could they possibly, in the John Carpenter Universe, accidentally and unrelated to the movie (but still in the same universe), come across a long-buried alien ship and have a Thing scenario?
Imagine with me.
Ok way to be super pedantic dude.
I went through the comment history to see if I’m at fault.
There is a schtick of not understanding comments and then pointing it out how the original comments makes no sense (to them).
Maybe it’s a contaminant getting out of hand or leaching into the environment?
See my other comment. It’s Antarctic required viewing.
Our point is that the only connection is Antarctica. That’s like having a piece about police brutality in Atlanta, Georgia (US) and then referencing the book series Wool (which is a TV series called Silo). It just doesn’t feel organic or work right.
It’s OK to miss the connection. I’ve linked one of the connections for you, plus the movie is literally set in Antarctica involving digging (like a cleanup).
I don’t know what else to say.
I recommend watching the movie because it’s a banger. That’s why I linked it originally.
It’s a reference to a movie you pair of dunces.
I’ve read the book and seen the movies multiple times.
My interpretation of the commenter above me and his question was how… The Thing has anything to do with the subject other than it just being Antarctica.
Or you are being way too pedantic…
