• melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    what’s the difference between profit-taking of private companies for government companies, and naked corruption?

    that’s not a joke, somebody please explain this to me.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    They made it so SSA takes 100% of your check for overpayment instead of just 10% to cover overpayments to “Get the money back quicker and punish overpayments” (Even though overpayment is usually an error made by SSA, not the recipient)

    It was 10% because leaving the applicant with enough money to survive is not only not cruel, it lowers the chances that the person will appeal and get one of those altruistic Pro-Bono Disability Lawyers involved (Many of whom are inspired to do so by being disabled and mistreated by the system themselves… met a few, all wonderful people)

    They will now be FLOODED in appeals, so many that many will likely be approved without examination due to lacking the resources to review them all and not wanting to get a disability lawyer involved to drain more time and energy from understaffed overworked offices

    What he’s done isn’t just cruel, it’s stupid and will have the opposite of the intended effect

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 hours ago

      and will have the opposite of the intended effect

      Pretty sure the intended effect is the eventual collapse of the USA, so this is one little helpful piece amount many

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No I assume an overworked system that cares more about lightening its workload than kissing Elon’s ring

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It would be nice if that were true, but unfortunately the debris falls over populated Caribbean islands to the east.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    “wasted” tax payer money means something different to musk, than normal people.

    its a “waste” if its not lining his pockets

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man, I’d sure hate to be in those two stranded astronauts’ shoes!

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Because they would have had to take the risk and come back in their leaky original vessel that made it home successfully?

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Not sure if I prefer a leaky vessel or to depend on the whims of an orange turd and an insufferable man child. Maybe the leaky ship would’ve been safer.

        • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Starship has nothing to do with the ISS crew. They’re coming back on the extremely reliable Dragon capsule that’s already up there.

          The “rescue” mission already launched and docked during the Biden Administration.

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Both awful choices none of the astronauts should have to deal with.

          To be fairer with the initial faulty ship, I’d say the difference in weight might have changed the odds of success.

    • caboose2006@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      SpaceX has been awarded 2.89 billion to develop starship into HLS. They have zero deliverables even though the first orbital flight was supposed to be 2021, cryogenic in orbit refueling in 2022… They’re supposed to be landing on the moon this year. They’re not even trying.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Starship’s development (and all of SpaceX, really) is being funded at least in part by government subsidies. They’re building it for NASA as their next manned vehicle platform.