• yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, they’re probably destroying a lot of Siberian ice to do this, so it might even have the same ecological impact as something like mining, I think

      • xoggy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just in general, mammoth fossils hold a lot of information that could tell us about the history of the local environment of those areas or new insights into the creatures’ lives as well. Also it’s not like more of this finite resource is still being produced or anything.

    • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Primarily I think people just don’t like it, they’re one of the smarter animals (I don’t know why we overlook the intelligence of pigs) and by all accounts quite sensitive and gentle.

      I assume if we could farm them then we would have, they’ve been used for entertainment and militarily for thousands of years. Maybe with our technology we’d have a better run, but then we’d be confronted with point 1.

      Do zoos count as farming though?