• imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish they’d have done a full NYC analysis. Just doing Manhattan has an obvious outcome, but including Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx would yield a more interesting result.

  • david@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Completely awesome content, thanks. I was hoping that some older cities were more random, and I was not disappointed.

  • zaphod@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird selection of cities. Very U.S. centric considering they claim “geographical diversity”.

    To better understand urban spatial order and city street network entropy, we analyze 100 large cities across North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Our sampling strategy emulates Louf and Barthelemy’s (2014) to select cities through a balance of high population, regional significance, and some stratification to ensure geographical diversity within regions.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    My city is on there! And it nearly fills in the whole circle. Unsurprising, as we effectively have streets that intersect with themselves. East coat USA is a clusterfuck of city planning.

  • RiverGhost@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a pretty cool visualization, thanks for sharing!

    Also I’m glad I’ve never lived in a grid city, feels off somehow.

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel constantly lost in non-grid cities. The Grid makes navigation so easy.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve lived in Boston and Detroit. Detroit is so much better to navigate in. I think if Boston included Cambridge, Somerville, Brookline and the other outskirts that are really greater Boston, it would be even more circular. It’sa mess getting around there.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Figured out th important parts around year 4-5. Still stayed for almost 15 more years for some reason and still got turned around some places.

            Only miss the good food (at least relative to where I live now).

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never felt anywhere near lost in a good non-grid city, particularly in the Netherlands and close-by of course.

  • Rooster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Denver’s entire downtown is a 45 degree slant from the rest of the city so the image is questionable…

    • chris2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you zoom in it does show some off axis stuff, and downtown is only a small portion of the entire city so it seems reasonable. Though it’s definitely inconsistent, like if it uses all of Denver city limits but for NYC only shows Manhattan and ignores the other 4 boroughs

    • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that was one of the first things I noticed. I thought I might have remembered incorrectly.

      Washington is a nice planned grid with lots of annoying diagonal avenues that don’t seem to be represented.

  • DrCrustacean [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there an advantage to having a city’s grid be perfectly oriented along NSEW? I get that if a city has a coast or waterfront, you’d want to align the grid with that, but would it mess anything up if a city’s grid were rotated like 15 degrees clockwise?

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In America, it makes it line up with existing lots. Remember that the homestead act gave a lot of people 40 acres, and those lots were oriented properly. A lot of American cities were built around those lots.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly why would the rotation matter at all? Not like the connecting roads are perfectly straight without curves either.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only major parts of Seattle that are not NS/EW are downtown and Belltown. Crackheads Denny and Boren each wanted their plots of land to have roads following different parts of the bay. Maynard called them a bunch of dumbasses and used true cardinal directions for roads.

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Johannesburg lmao. The disorganization and urban sprawl there, that also connects Joburg to Pretoria should be a crime against urban planning. The East Rand, Midrand, Wits, all of it. Apartheid spacial planning and our failure to address it has really messed us up.

  • Amilo159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who just drove through Oslo Centrum today, yeah, it’s indeed accurate. A fucking mess is what it is.