• Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    Every new signal defy explanation for a little while, until it’s explained.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Apparently not yet, astronomers are still waiting for the signal to repeat to appropriately study it.

        METI president Douglas Vakoch told Die Welt that any putative SETI signal detections must be replicated for confirmation, and the lack of such replication for the Wow! signal means it has little credibility.[3

        For now there are just guesses. If such burst isn’t a fluke and repeats, astronomers will get a chance to better study it and provide a confident explanation.

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    The title here is a little misleading. A signal that repeated once per hour, as in 60 minutes, would be pretty astounding, and might be a good way for a civilization with enough information about us to say ‘hi’ in a way we’d recognize. It would certainly be very strange to see a natural phenomenon ticking away the hours at a precise rate.

    53.8 minutes, on the other hand, is a bit less attention grabbing.

    • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d argue that a more precise timing like 53.8 minutes is more attention grabbing. It shows finer grained control of technology; a “look here! we can do this too!” sort of demonstration.

      If we are the “more advanced” neighbor; then I could see that being done.

      • millie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s more that their knowing what an hour is would be impressive. Our selection of the hour as a measure of time is arbitrary outside of its specific context. It’s just 1/24th of our planet’s rotational period. We could just as easily split the day up into 10ths or 15ths or 7ths or whatever.

        To broadcast a signal that’s exactly an hour long to a planet that uses the hour as a measure of time might potentially imply someone trying to reference our way of measuring time. A signal that repeats every 53.8 minutes is on a timer that isn’t specifically relevant to Earth in the same way an hour exactly would be.

        • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That signal might be insignificant to us; but it may be their way of establishing a timescale.

          The time may be derived from how long their planet takes to rotate…aka the length of one sub-unit of their day…aka 1/24th of their day.

          • Umbrias@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Or, it could be the periodicity of the lifecycle of a cool bug they like, or it could be just a random period from any huge number of celestial objects we have yet to categorize. I have a guess for which of these options it is, personally.

      • Kissaki@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Such a cycle is a cycle like any other. It’s not “more precise” when it’s shorter.

        We attribute the 53.8 according to our scale.

  • darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Then they find out it’s the the low battery warning on a carbon monoxide detector under the stairs of the emergency exit.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      The article describes how the characteristics of this signal don’t match any of the current models for neutron stars or white dwarfs. So quite possibly, but the question is how.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Personally I think the more complex pattern of having 3 different states being cycled through once an hour is significantly less likely to be natural.

    That, of course, doesn’t mean much by itself; it still is possible that it is natural and we just don’t understand why. More research into how and why that is happening is absolutely required to answer the question. I just don’t know if we will do it, or if we have the tech needed to fully investigate it yet.