• Shepy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not volunteering if its mandatory, that’s slavery

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Let me guess, only men will be forced?

    He added the move would help young people learn “real world skills, do new things and contribute to their community and our country”.

    LMAO. You know where else they could learn this? In schools, if it were taught! Vocational schools exist too. Or community outreach, or a bunch of other things that don’t involve forcing a person to work for the army.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Their other option would be to volunteer one weekend per month - or 25 days per year - in their community with organisations such as fire, police and the NHS.

    What if you work weekends?

    Also where does the other day come from?

    Is a weekend 2 days and 2 hours?

    • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because doctors, nurses, firefighters and police have plenty of spare time to train and supervise uninterested and untrained 18 year olds.

      • milkisklim@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh they won’t be doing the training. Some MP’s mate with a consulting company will do that for cheep… promise!

  • IbnLemmy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tories are cooking…whatever crap they can to appeal to their voter base.

    That same voter base that voted Brexit because of some stupid dream they had that things were better in the past

    Pulling at the same chords, tories appealing to the same delusion that sending the youth to the army… Jesus…right out of the lunatic right playbook

  • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    It doesn’t matter what they say, they are going to lose and won’t be able to see anything through.

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I know it’s an unpopular opinion, but I don’t hate the idea of national service.

    I feel like a nation that has a basic first hand knowledge of the army may be slightly better prepared in war time.

    I have other reasons as well but sadly not enough time to elaborate right now.

    I’m always happy to have it pointed out to me why my opinions are wrong, though, so have at me if you think it’s a terrible idea.

    I do understand that this in itself is an appeal to the voter base, though. They don’t give a shit about the outcome of making it a thing.

  • Baggins@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    When you get past the image of square bashing, room inspections and peeling potatoes, it might not be such a bad idea. Especially as there will be non military options.